社区由日常联系和共同事务连接。居民不一定拥有相同生活方式。公园涉及儿童、老人和附近商户。参与者应包括常被忽略的人。Communities connect people through everyday ties and shared affairs. Residents need not live alike. A park affects children, older people, and local shops. Participation should include people often overlooked.
第 2 步：把意见变成可比较方案Step 2: Turn views into comparable plans
大家意见不同，怎样讨论？How can different views be discussed?
先说明预算与限制。再比较维修、增设和保养方案。公开理由有助于理解取舍。投票之外，也需要听取少数人的需求。State the budget and constraints. Compare repair, additions, and upkeep. Public reasons make trade-offs understandable. Voting alone does not replace listening to minority needs.
第 3 步：规则需要持续维护Step 3: Rules need ongoing care
决定做出后，事情就结束了吗？Is the job over once a decision is made?
还需有人执行、记录和检查。规则应清楚说明责任。使用结果可能要求调整方案。社区合作是一段持续过程。People must implement, record, and check the work. Rules should make responsibilities clear. Results may require changes. Community cooperation is an ongoing process.
🎮 机制实验室：观察，再判断🎮 Mechanism lab: observe, then decide
总预算一百。维修至少三十，无障碍至少二十；调到满足需求且不超预算。数字为虚构。Budget 100. Repair needs at least 30; accessibility at least 20. Meet both without overspending. Figures are fictional.
一句话记住它：Remember it:社区合作把共同需求变成参与、规则与持续维护。Community cooperation turns shared needs into participation, rules, and ongoing care.
社区由日常联系和共同事务连接。Communities connect people through everyday ties and shared affairs.先说明预算与限制。State the budget and constraints.还需有人执行、记录和检查。People must implement, record, and check the work.
参与式规划框架：较高把握。具体程序因地区而异，课堂公园与预算均为虚构。High confidence in participatory-planning principles. Procedures differ by place; the park and budget are fictional.
核对日期：2026 年 10 月 6 日。文字与配图由 AI 生成；已做来源核对及程序测试，待人工复核。Checked 6 October 2026. Text and illustrations are AI-generated. Sources and software checks were performed; human review is pending.
Back to tree
